6 AI Prompts That Check Your Email Deliverability and Explain the Results

🕐 ✍️ Sandeep Saxena🗂️ Email Deliverability, Email Tools

6 AI prompts that check your email deliverability and explain the results - Postbox Services

Not so long ago, checking your email deliverability was a project in itself. You had to learn how DNS records like SPF, DKIM and DMARC work, put together a handful of separate tools, run test after test, and then compile all the results yourself, just to answer one simple question: are my emails reaching the inbox? Today that work has shrunk to a fraction, and AI prompts for email deliverability are the reason. Type a good prompt into Claude or ChatGPT and things start taking shape in front of your eyes: the checks run, the results come in, and the AI explains them in plain words. Here are six AI prompts for email deliverability that you can copy and use today.

There is one small catch. On its own, an AI can't see your DNS records or your blacklist status, so it can only guess. Connect it to a free live checking tool and it stops guessing: it runs the checks first and explains them second. That takes about two minutes, and the box below shows you how.

After that, copy any prompt, change the domain to yours, and in a few minutes you'll know where your email stands and what to fix first. You don't need to be a DNS expert to start.

Before you start, connect the free Postbox Services MCP server (2 minutes, no account)

  1. In Claude, open Settings, then Connectors, then Discover, and search "postbox". In ChatGPT, Grok or Cursor, add this address as a custom MCP server: https://mcp.postboxservices.com/mcp
  2. Approve the tools the first time your AI asks to use them.
  3. Paste any prompt below.

Step-by-step setup for each app: Connect the MCP server. Want to see the tools on their own first? 8 real examples, one per question.

The 6 AI prompts for email deliverability at a glance

#CheckWhat it tells youTools the AI uses
1The 60-second domain health checkIs my domain clean, protected and trusted?Blacklist, spoofing grade, domain age
2The spam test, explained line by lineWhat is my real score, and what costs me points?Spam test (create + result)
3Why did this email go to spam?What in this message or its headers looks bad?.eml analysis, IP blacklist, spoofing grade
4Check every link before I hit sendDo my links land where I think, and are they clean?Redirect trace, domain blacklist
5Is my new domain ready for cold email?Can I start sending, or should I wait?Domain age, spoofing grade, blacklist, spam test
6Can my logo show up in the inbox?Is my BIMI setup right, and what is still missing?BIMI check, spoofing grade

The full prompt to copy is in each section below. They work in ChatGPT, Claude and Grok, and the answers will look a little different in each. Every section says which AI we used for its screenshots.

Prompt 1: The 60-second domain health check

If you only try one prompt today, make it this one. In about a minute you'll know three things: whether your domain is on a blacklist, whether someone could fake it, and whether it's old enough to have built up some trust.

You askUsing the Postbox Services tools, check the email health of my domain example.com. Is it on any blacklist, how exposed is it to spoofing, and how old is it? Give me a one-line verdict first, then the problems ranked by how much they hurt my deliverability, with the fix for each. Tell me anything you couldn't verify.

What your AI does: it runs three tools: the domain blacklist check, the spoofing grade and the domain age lookup.

What came back for postboxservices.com (6 Nov 2026):

  • Blacklists: clean on all 6 domain lists checked.
  • Spoofing grade: B. DMARC is at p=reject, SPF ends in -all, and MTA-STS and BIMI are present. The one gap: 3 live lookalike domains (postboxservice.com, postboxservices.net, postboxservices.in).
  • Domain age: registered August 2017, about 9.3 years old.

The screenshots for this prompt are from ChatGPT.

ChatGPT answering Prompt 1 for postboxservices.com with a one-line verdict and a clean result on 6 domain blacklists
The verdict comes first. ChatGPT gives its one-line answer, then the blacklist check: 0 listings across 6 lists.
ChatGPT showing spoofing grade B for postboxservices.com, with every check passing except 3 lookalike domains
Spoofing grade B. Everything passes except the 3 live lookalike domains.
ChatGPT showing a domain age of 9.3 years, problems ranked by importance, what it couldn't verify and a recommendation to run a live email test
Domain age, the ranked problems and what it couldn't verify. The answer ends by recommending a live email test.

How to read it: a clean blacklist result and an enforced DMARC policy are the two things to look for first. Our B comes from the lookalike domains alone, and no DNS setting can stop someone registering one of those. If your grade is D or F, fix DMARC before anything else. Our SPF, DKIM and DMARC guide shows how.

What it couldn't verify, and where to find out: the prompt asked for this, so the answer ends with an honest list. That isn't a weakness. This prompt looks at your domain, not at an email you actually sent, and ChatGPT's own recommendation is the right next step: run a live test with Postbox Mailtester, which is Prompt 2. That settles the first two items below. The others need a different source.

What it couldn't verifyWhere to find out
Are your sending IPs on an IP blacklist?Prompt 2: the spam test checks the IP that delivered your test email
Are DKIM and alignment right for every sending service?Prompt 2: run one test from each service you send with
Do your emails reach the inbox at Gmail, Outlook and Yahoo?Prompt 2 shows whether anything obvious would trip a filter, but only a seed or inbox placement test shows where mail lands. Our comparison of spam testing tools explains the difference
Who owns the lookalike domains?Check your own registrar account first. Ask your AI for a WHOIS lookup on the rest, though many domains hide their owner
Is your sending reputation healthy?Google Postmaster Tools for Gmail

Tip: you can compare yourself with a competitor too. In the same chat, ask "compare example.com with competitor.com on all above parameters and draw a table". Your AI runs the same checks on both domains and puts them side by side. We tried it below in ChatGPT. We picked competitor.com only for its name: it's a real domain, and these are its public records on 6 Nov 2026.

ChatGPT comparing postboxservices.com with competitor.com in a side-by-side table: grade B against grade F
The follow-up question and the side-by-side table. A one-line verdict first, then every parameter for both domains.
ChatGPT final assessment table naming the better performer in each area, with a bottom line that domain age does not make up for missing DMARC
The final assessment. The older domain wins on age, but age doesn't make up for missing DMARC.

Prompt 2: The spam test, explained line by line

Your DNS records can look perfect and a real email can still lose points. Some problems only show up once you actually send something, including the sending IP and DKIM questions Prompt 1 couldn't answer. This prompt runs a full spam test on a real email, then walks you through the result one line at a time.

You askUsing the Postbox Services tools, run an email deliverability test for me. Give me the test address, then wait until I tell you I've sent the email. When I say "sent", get the result and explain every deduction in plain words, starting with the one that costs me the most points, and tell me exactly what to change.

What your AI does: it creates a one-time test address. You send a normal email to it from the account you want to test: your newsletter tool, your CRM or your own mailbox. Then you type "sent" and the AI fetches the score.

What came back for our test email (6 Nov 2026): a perfect 10 out of 10, so there were no deductions to explain. On your own test, any deductions are explained here, biggest first.

The screenshots for this prompt are from Claude.

Claude creating a one-time test address for the spam test and waiting for the word sent
Claude creates the test address and waits for you to say "sent".
A Gmail message titled Long time no talk being written to the test address
Send your email to that address from the account you want to test. Use your real subject and body, so the content checks mean something.
Claude reporting a perfect 10 out of 10 with no deductions and linking to the full report
The result, in plain words. Claude gives the score from the tool and points to the full report for the line-by-line detail.

Want the full detail? Open the report link. We also asked Claude "Show me results in full". We had Claude in Chrome connected, so it opened the report page and laid it out for us. Without a browser connector, your AI may only have the summary.

Claude listing the tested message details: sender, subject, sending IP and format, with a score of 10 out of 10
The message tested. A 10 out of 10 with six warnings, none of which cost points.
Claude listing the SpamAssassin rules that fired and their points, for a content score of plus 0.2
The content score, rule by rule. Our report flips SpamAssassin's usual sign, so plus is good and -5 or lower is treated as spam.

How to read it: the score is out of 10 and combines authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC and alignment), reputation (blacklists, reverse DNS and domain age), your content score and message formatting. A 9 or 10 means technically clean, 7 or 8 means there are issues you can correct, and below 7 means something is actively hurting delivery. The report also checks the Gmail and Yahoo sender requirements.

Know the limit: your AI's answer is a summary, so open the full report link it gives you as well, even after a good score. That page has the line-by-line detail, like the exact content score and the sending IP. And a clean result covers this one message from this one system, so test each tool you send with.

Tip: test the exact email you are about to send, from the exact tool that will send it. A test from your Gmail tells you nothing about your Mailchimp setup.

Prompt 3: Why did this email go to spam?

You spent an hour on an email and it landed in spam. It's frustrating, but the good news is that the email itself holds a lot of clues. Download it as an .eml file and give it to your AI. In Gmail, open the three-dot menu on the message and choose "Download message". Most other mail apps have a similar option.

You askThis email landed in spam. Here is the original .eml file. Using the Postbox Services tools, read the headers and the content and tell me the most likely reasons, ranked. Also find the sending IP in the Received headers and check it against blacklists, and grade the From domain for spoofing. Separate what you checked live from what you could only infer from the file.

What your AI does: it runs the .eml analysis, then a blacklist check on the IP it finds in the headers and a spoofing grade on the sender's domain.

What came back for a real phishing email from our spam folder (6 Nov 2026): Claude ranked seven likely reasons and marked each one as checked live or inferred from the file. The strongest was a live result: the sending IP was listed on 3 of the 22 blacklists that answered, including Spamhaus ZEN and CBL. The From domain got an F, with no SPF or DMARC. The file itself showed fake Received headers and hidden filler text. Claude also told us not to click anything and to report the email as phishing.

The screenshots for this prompt are from Claude.

A phishing email titled Failure Notice in the Gmail spam folder, with the three-dot menu open on Download message
Getting the file. Gmail's three-dot menu has "Download message". This one is a real phishing email that landed in our spam folder.
The Prompt 3 text in Claude with an attached file named Failure Notice.eml
Attach the .eml and paste the prompt.
Claude listing seven likely reasons the email went to spam, each marked as checked live or inferred from the file
The reasons, most likely first. Each one says whether it was checked live or inferred from the file, because the prompt asked for that.
Claude table of live checks: the sending IP listed on 3 of 22 blacklists, and F grades for both domains
What was checked live. The sending IP is on Spamhaus ZEN and CBL, and both domains get an F.
Claude listing what it could only read from the file, including the sending IP's Received line, then advising to report the email as phishing
What could only be read from the file, and what to do next.

How to read it: look at the authentication results in the headers first. A DKIM or DMARC failure is the first thing to fix. If authentication passes and the IP is clean, the cause is more likely the content or your sending reputation with that mailbox provider.

Know the limit: from a file, SPF, blacklists and reverse DNS can't be checked as they were when the email was sent. That is why the prompt asks for a live check on the IP, and why Prompt 2 is the final word on your score.

Stay safe: if your AI says an email is phishing, don't click anything in it, and report it to your mail provider.

Prompt 4: Check every link before I hit send

Most of us read our subject line ten times and never look at our links. Spam filters do look at them. One link to a blacklisted domain, or a chain of redirects through a link shortener, can work against a good email.

You askHere are the links in my email: [paste links]. Using the Postbox Services tools, trace each one to its final destination, tell me how many redirects it goes through, flag any shorteners or http links, and check every final domain against the domain blacklists. Then tell me which links I should replace.

What your AI does: it runs the redirect trace on every link, then the domain blacklist check on each final domain.

What came back for a tracking link from a Singapore Airlines marketing email in our inbox (6 Nov 2026): 2 hops, all over HTTPS. The t12.email.singaporeair.com tracking link redirects once to www.krisshop.com, which returned HTTP 200 and is clean on all 6 domain blacklists. The tool raised one flag, final_domain_differs, because the link ends on a different domain from where it started. The AI's verdict: keep it, as long as this is the promotion you meant to send.

The screenshots for this prompt are from ChatGPT.

The Prompt 4 text in ChatGPT with one Singapore Airlines tracking link pasted in
Paste your links into the prompt. We tried it with one tracking link from a real marketing email.
ChatGPT verdict and redirect trace: one redirect, from a Singapore Airlines tracking link to www.krisshop.com over HTTPS
The verdict first, then the redirect trace. One redirect, from the tracking domain to the final page.
ChatGPT showing krisshop.com clean on all 6 domain blacklists
The final domain against the blacklists. Clean on all six.
ChatGPT security flags table: no shortener, no http link, and one cross-domain redirect
The security flags. No shortener and no http link. The one flag is the jump to a different domain.
ChatGPT advising to keep the link, with a caveat about what a clean blacklist result can't prove
Which links to replace. None here, with a fair warning about what a clean result can't prove.

How to read it: one or two hops are fine. Watch out for shorteners (bit.ly and similar), long redirect chains, a jump to a different domain, and any final domain that appears on a blacklist. Use the full https link to your own site wherever you can.

A flag isn't automatically a problem. Email tools often send links through a tracking domain, as this one does, so just confirm that the final domain is the one you meant to link to. And a clean result only means the domain isn't on these lists. It doesn't prove the page is safe.

Tip: paste one link per line, so your AI can tell where each one starts and ends.

Prompt 5: Is my new domain ready for cold email?

It's tempting to buy a new domain, connect it and start sending the same day. That is one of the easiest ways to hurt a cold email campaign before it begins. This prompt checks the setup and the age of your domain first, so you know how carefully to start.

You askI want to send cold email from my new domain outreach-example.com. Using the Postbox Services tools, check its age, grade its SPF and DMARC setup, and check it against blacklists. Then tell me honestly whether it is ready, what to fix first, and how carefully I should start. If it helps, set up a spam test for me too.

What your AI does: it runs the domain age lookup, the spoofing grade and the blacklist check, and can set up the spam test from Prompt 2 as the last step.

What came back for our own new domain, postboxservices.ai (6 Nov 2026): not ready for cold email at scale, even though the basics look good. SPF ends in -all, DMARC is at p=reject, the spoofing grade is B and all 6 domain blacklists are clean. The problem is age: the domain is only 30 days old, so it has almost no sending reputation. DNS checks also can't confirm DKIM or the sending IP, so ChatGPT set up a spam test as the next step and suggested a gradual start.

The screenshots for this prompt are from ChatGPT.

The Prompt 5 text in ChatGPT for the new domain postboxservices.ai
The prompt, with our own new domain. In this run we also asked for WHOIS, which you can leave out.
ChatGPT verdict that postboxservices.ai is not ready for cold email at scale, with a domain age of 30 days and WHOIS details
The honest verdict first. At 30 days old, the domain is the biggest obstacle to starting. The WHOIS details below it are extra, from the same run.
ChatGPT showing grade B for postboxservices.ai, with SPF and DMARC passing and MTA-STS and BIMI not present
SPF and DMARC. A good start, but passing here doesn't prove your sending platform is set up correctly.
ChatGPT showing postboxservices.ai clean on all 6 domain blacklists
Blacklists. Clean, though this checks the domain and not your sending IP.
ChatGPT table of problems ranked by priority, with the 30-day domain age first
What to fix, in order. Age comes first, then DKIM and the sending IP.
ChatGPT suggesting a gradual 30-day start for a new domain, with a note that the volumes are not safe limits
How carefully to start. These volumes are the AI's suggestions, not safe limits, and it says so.
ChatGPT showing a disposable spam test address for the new domain, with the status pending
The spam test, ready to use. Send a real email to this address, then say "sent".

How to read it: a domain a few weeks old has no sending reputation yet, so start with small volumes, even if every DNS check passes. A missing DMARC record or an SPF record that doesn't include your sending tool has to be fixed before day one. Our cold email guide covers the rest.

Prompt 6: Can my logo show up in the inbox?

Save this one for last. BIMI is the standard that lets your logo appear next to your emails, and it's a nice reward once your authentication is in good shape. It won't rescue an email from the spam folder, but it does help people recognise you in a crowded inbox. Getting it right means a DNS record, a logo in a very particular SVG format and a strict DMARC policy, which is exactly the kind of checking an AI can do for you.

You askUsing the Postbox Services tools, check whether example.com is ready to show its logo in the inbox. Check its BIMI record and logo, and grade its DMARC setup. Give me a one-line verdict first, then what is missing, in the order I should fix it. Tell me clearly what you couldn't verify, including any certificate.

What your AI does: it runs the BIMI check, which looks up the record, fetches the logo and tests it against the BIMI logo rules. Then it runs the spoofing grade, because BIMI also needs DMARC at enforcement.

What came back for paypal.com (6 Nov 2026):

  • BIMI record: published, pointing to a logo and a certificate.
  • Logo: passes all 11 checks.
  • DMARC: enforced. Claude saw the B grade and that direct forgery is blocked, and the spoofing check itself shows p=reject.

Claude's verdict: on everything it could check, paypal.com is ready, but it couldn't confirm that the certificate is valid. The certificate matters more than it looks: without one, Gmail won't show your logo, however clean the rest of your setup is.

The screenshots for this prompt are from Claude.

The Prompt 6 text in Claude for paypal.com, with the BIMI record and logo check running
The prompt, run on paypal.com. Claude starts with the BIMI record and logo check.
Claude verdict that paypal.com is ready on everything it could check, with the BIMI record found, the logo passing all 11 checks and a certificate listed but not verified
The verdict, the live checks and what's left to do. Nothing is missing here, so what's left is checking, not fixing.
Claude listing what it couldn't verify for paypal.com: the certificate, the exact DMARC record, what is behind the B grade and whether inboxes show the logo
What it couldn't verify. The tool confirms a certificate is listed, but it doesn't check the certificate itself.

How to read it: fix things in this order.

  • DMARC comes first. BIMI needs a policy of quarantine or reject. At p=none, nothing else matters yet.
  • Then the logo. If a logo check fails, the result names the rule it broke, so you can ask your AI what to change in the file.
  • Then the certificate, depending on where your readers are. Gmail needs a VMC or a CMC. Yahoo doesn't currently require one, though it has its own conditions, including your sending volume and reputation. Outlook doesn't support BIMI at all. Our BIMI setup guide covers the certificates and the other mailbox providers.

Know the limit: the tool reports whether a certificate is referenced, but it doesn't verify the certificate itself. And a clean result is not a promise, because each mailbox provider decides for itself when to show a logo.

Don't see the BIMI tool? It was added on 5 November 2026. If you connected before then, your AI may still have the old tool list, so disconnect the Postbox Services server and connect it again.

Four habits that make any deliverability prompt better

  • Name the tools. Start with "Using the Postbox Services tools". If you have web search or other connectors switched on, this makes the AI more likely to run our live checks instead of searching the web or answering from memory. In ChatGPT you may also need to pick the connector in the chat before you send the prompt.
  • Name the exact target. A domain, an IP or the email itself. "Check my email" gives the AI nothing to measure.
  • Ask for a ranked fix list. "What should I fix first?" turns a wall of results into a to-do list.
  • Ask what it couldn't verify. A good answer says when a list didn't respond or a check wasn't possible. If yours doesn't, ask.

What these prompts can't tell you

We want to be honest about this part. These checks measure your setup and your message. They can't see how Gmail or Microsoft rate you as a sender, or how many people mark your email as spam. For Gmail, that lives in Google Postmaster Tools. Use the two together and you'll have most of the picture.

Want the tools without a chat? All of them are free on the web: Postbox Services tools. And if the results show something you'd rather hand over, this is what we do.

Summarize with AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Do these prompts work in ChatGPT, Claude and Grok?

Yes, once the Postbox Services MCP server is connected. Without it, the AI can only guess, because your DNS and blacklist status aren't in its training data. See the setup guide.

Is it free?

Yes, with no account or API key. Fair-use limits keep it fast for everyone.

Can the AI send email for me?

No. For the spam test you send the email yourself; the AI only creates the test address and reads the result.

Is my email content stored?

No. Uploaded .eml files are processed in memory and not stored. Full policy on the setup page.

If Prompt 6 passes, will my logo appear?

Not necessarily. Most big mailbox providers have extra conditions, such as a certificate for Gmail or a good sending reputation for Yahoo, and Outlook doesn't support BIMI at all.

How often should I run these?

Prompt 1 once a month and after any DNS change, Prompt 2 before every new campaign or tool change, Prompts 3 and 4 whenever something lands in spam, and Prompt 6 after you change your logo or your DMARC policy.

Connect the MCP serverThe 2-minute setup for Claude, ChatGPT, Grok and Cursor, plus the full tool list and data-handling policy.
Chat with us!